ADT Spam Texts are an example of marketing messages that can be sent to potential customers by automated software. These text messages are sent by companies authorized to sell ADT products and services. In one recent instance, ADT paid a spokeswoman to promote its ADT Pulse home security system. This article outlines some of the key points in the lawsuit. You should read it thoroughly. If you haven’t read it yet, here is the most important information you should know.
ADT violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The ADT Spam Texts Lawsuit alleges that ADT used an automatic telephone dialing system without the customers’ consent to send automated text messages that promote their services. The company, ADT, is a Delaware limited liability company that provides security monitoring services. The class action complaint seeks damages for consumers who received such messages. ADT Spam Texts Lawsuit – ADT Violates the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The ADT Security robocall lawsuit claims that ADT violated the Texas Debt Collection Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending harassing texts. Dawn claims that her attempts to stop the calls were ignored and that she was subjected to hostile responses. During one such call, an ADT representative screamed, “Pay Your Bill!” and told her she couldn’t stop the calls until she paid her debts. Since then, Dawn says she has received at least 30 robocalls from ADT Security and received no help from the company.
The TCPA outlines a variety of consumer protections and rules that protect consumers from telemarketers and solicitors. The Act defines an “unsolicited” telemarketing call as one that’s made without the consumer’s consent. As such, it’s illegal to send spam text messages without the consumer’s permission. This includes sending text messages to landlines and cell phones.
ADT failed to provide safeguards to prevent a technician from gaining remote access to security cameras
Several ADT customers claim they were spied on by an ADT employee. These customers are seeking $5 million in damages after the security company failed to protect their privacy. They allege that an ADT technician added his email address to the account of each customer, which allowed him to view video streams of their security cameras. The employee also accessed customers’ accounts for more than seven years.
ADT admitted to failing to provide safeguards to prevent a technician from gaining remote access to security cameras. According to the lawsuit, the company failed to implement a standard process to protect its customers. The customer said an ADT technician added his email address to their account, claiming that he was temporarily testing the system. But he did so without the customer’s knowledge.
Although security companies should make their security cameras password-protected, this did not prevent one company’s technician from viewing a customer’s video feeds. Security companies should take this precaution to keep their customers’ data safe. ADT has stepped up security for its customers’ video footage, but some customers don’t trust the company’s security system.
ADT paid spokespeople to promote the ADT Pulse home security system
The FTC has charged home security company ADT LLC with misleading consumers about paid endorsements. The FTC alleges that ADT paid spokespeople to write favorable reviews about the ADT Pulse on television, radio, and blogs. These paid spokespeople portrayed themselves as experts in child safety, home security, and technology and did not disclose that they were paid to promote the Pulse system.
The FTC has given its preliminary approval for the settlement but is awaiting the public comment period, which runs from March 6 to April 7. The settlement requires ADT to avoid misrepresenting its independent review and to disclose all material connections with its paid spokespeople. The FTC has warned consumers about such misleading claims and will continue to investigate complaints about the ADT Pulse.
ADT Pulse’s price is similar to that of ADT’s Vivint. Users must purchase an ADT Pulse home security system with monitored burglary service. Users will need a compatible cell phone or PDA to use the Pulse mobile app. The Pulse mobile app is a convenient daily monitor that can be used for the same purpose as the web portal. ADT Pulse has several levels of service but is more expensive for a customized system.
COVID Safety Lawsuits Against Amazon
New York Attorney General Letitia James recently filed a lawsuit against Amazon based on worker safety during the COVID-19 pandemic and illegal retaliation. While the case was dismissed by an appeals court, the lawsuit’s main claim was that Amazon exposed employees to the disease in two facilities in New York City and unlawfully retaliated against […]