Bell and Howell Pest Repeller lawsuit is a Pest Control Company from Britain that is currently involved in a high profile case with the U.S. In July, Bell & Howell Pest Management was sued by the National Health and Safety Authority for failing to ensure the installation of the Bell’s V Threads anti-infestation device on all its property. The company has strenuously denied any liability and the lawsuit are currently underway in the U.S.
Bell and Howell are a member of the British organization known as the Institute of Chemical Engineering.
Its operations are supervised by the UK government. The company received authorization to use the V Thread anti-mite product in the United Kingdom in 1998. It is claimed that Bell & Howell’s anti-mite policy was not effective and did not keep pests or allergens from entering the homes of its customers. The lawsuit is being handled by the National Health and Safety Authority or NHS in the United Kingdom. An independent anti-mite expert is conducting testing on the effectiveness of the Bell & Howell policy in relation to his ongoing study with Bell & Howell Pest Management’s current operations.
The Bell & Howell Company is headquartered in Britain. The co-owner of the company is John Cade. John Cade owns a number of companies in the UK and America. The founder of the company is John Cole, who also happens to be Cade’s cousin. John Cade did not attend the installation of the Bell and Howell anti-mite system.
The Bell and Howell Company sell a variety of cleaning and deodorizing products.
These cleaning products can be used on a home as well as an office. One of the companies’ products is the Bell & Howell Deodorizing Stick. This cleaning stick can be used along with other Bell and Howell products including the Bell and Howell Dead Air Pollution Eliminator.
The Bell and Howell Company have a long history of providing high quality cleaning products. When the Bell and Howell Company began in 1849, it was one of the first companies to use the chemicals sodium sulfate. Today, sodium sulfate is still used in some Bell and Howell products. Sulfate is a commonly used chemical compound that has been proven toxic.
In their Bell and Howell Pest Repeller lawsuit, plaintiffs’ attorney stated that the company failed to conduct an adequate risk assessment prior to developing and selling its pest repellent.
The company failed to conduct an assessment of how many people would likely be exposed to the Bell and Howell Pest Repeller until it had developed the product. plaintiffs’ attorneys are accusing the company of repeatedly failing to take steps to ensure that its product was safe for use by consumers. The fact that Bell and Howell did not conduct an adequate risk assessment is what led to the suit.
The company has a policy that states that it will stop using sodium sulfate from its products if there are studies that show its continued danger.
If this policy is consistently ignored then consumers may be exposed to these very dangerous chemicals. The Bell and Howell Company has also refused to take safety precautions that would keep its consumers safe from its products. For example, it has not signed the Compact for Safe Cosmetics. The Compact for Safe Cosmetics requires manufacturers to use lye, a harmless substance that is used to make soap, detergent, and other cosmetics.
You can help put a stop to the Bell and Howell Pest Repeller lawsuit by making sure that your Bell and Howell pest repellant products are made from all natural ingredients.
Natural products are safer for you to use, do not contain lye, and have fewer risks than chemicals. If you think that you are exposed to lye or if you’ve been suffering from symptoms of exposure, you should immediately contact a personal injury attorney who specializes in lawsuits involving products containing lye. If you’re not sure whether or not you’re legally able to sue the company for its inadequate safety practices, you should talk to a lawyer today.
Average Rating
The Zotec Partners Lawsuit
This article discusses the Zotec Partnership and their lawsuit against Zynga. We’ll examine the lawsuit itself, as well as what the Wikimedia foundation and others have to say about it. The information in this article is presented for information purposes only. You should not try to apply or utilize the information contained herein without seeking […]