Skip to content
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy
  • Write for Us
  • Sitemap
Law Cost
March 25, 2023
  • Laws
  • Accident Law
  • Employment Law
  • Injury Law

Search Field

  • Home
  • Laws
  • Save on Resorts’ False Claims Class Action Lawsuit

Chrysler Lawsuit Settlement

Starbucks Class Action Lawsuit Dismissed

  • Laws

Save on Resorts’ False Claims Class Action Lawsuit

Gavin January 9, 2022

The lawsuit filed by Lugo and his family against Travel Resorts of America Inc. alleges a nationwide scheme of deception and fraud. The plaintiffs claim they were cheated out of tens of thousands of dollars and were not notified of their rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). A representative from Wyndham told the couple the benefits of owning a timeshare would outweigh any disadvantages they might have faced. They were told they would never pay for another vacation and would save tens of thousands of dollars. The sales representative allegedly convinced the couple that their vacations would last them a lifetime and they could even pass their timeshare onto their children.

To protect its reputation, Vail Resorts has been pursuing two similar class-action cases in California.

To avoid being named in the other cases, potential defendants must file a “notice of related cases” to inform the plaintiffs that they are already fighting other cases with similar claims. To file a notice of related cases, Vail Resorts has extended its settlement offer to the two California lawsuits. The company filed a motion to postpone the Colorado lawsuit while the California cases were settled. Nevertheless, if these settlements are successful, Vail could argue that they are not subject to a class-action case because the Colorado case would include the same claims.

Vail Resorts filed a class-action lawsuit in the Colorado district court in February. It is known as the Quintet al. case and contains more expansive claims. This would make it easier to reach a more meaningful settlement. Although the Colorado case has the same merits as the California cases, the company has filed 15 other actions in which the companies were found to be responsible for a timeshare owner’s cancellation.

Vail Resorts and its subsidiaries are suing over the alleged illegal practices of collecting unauthorized membership fees and using false data to make fraudulent claims.

The lawsuit also claims that the resorts have violated the EFTA by debiting canceled members’ bank accounts repeatedly and failed to provide written agreements to class members. The California cases are similar to the Colorado case, but the California case has more specific claims against the company.

The lawsuit claims that Travel Resorts violated the EFTA by making their membership cancellation policies illegitimate. The court found that the company had no right to cancel members who had already decided to sue. The Colorado case could result in a class-action settlement. But the California case may not be included in the class-action settlement. But it might lead to a settlement between the parties. The judge’s ruling could have a significant impact on the outcome of the California suits.

The Colorado court has granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the two California cases and the Colorado case.

The two lawsuits were previously related to the same claim. The Arizona and Colorado cases were filed separately. However, the Arizona and California cases were settled. The Utah cases were resolved by the court. They filed a separate claim in the California case. Neither party defended the lawsuits. This is a win-win for the plaintiffs.

In the Colorado case, Travel Resorts of America has also filed two other class-action cases in the same court. In California, the group also claims that the defendant is guilty of multiple violations of EFTA. Those lawsuits were filed against the resorts in the state of Utah, which is why they are appealing the ruling. They have been sued by several consumers for their high-pressure sales tactics. They are not required to settle with the plaintiffs, but the settlement offers a more favorable outcome.

A settlement in the Arizona case will likely save the plaintiffs some money.

In the Colorado case, however, the company’s settlement offers have been withdrawn in favor of a class-action settlement. It is not clear whether the California cases will prevail. If the Colorado lawsuit is successful, the DuBoses’ claims would be included in the California cases. If the California case is successful, the company would have to settle the other two.

Share

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

About Post Author

Gavin

[email protected]
https://lawcost.org
Happy
Happy
0 0 %
Sad
Sad
0 0 %
Excited
Excited
0 0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 0 %
Angry
Angry
1 100 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 0 %

Recent Posts

  • Nerve Injury, Burns, and Amputations Occurring After IV Infiltration Are All Possible
  • Adjustable Rate Mortgage Interest Rates Lawsuits
  • Additional Companies For Forced Placed Flood Insurance
  • Chase Adjustable Rate Mortgage Lawsuit
  • How to File an ADT Security Lawsuit
  • Allura Fiber Cement Decking Lawsuits
  • Allura Siding Lawsuit Settlement
  • Counterfeit Book Lawsuits – Why Consumers Are Turning to Legal Action
  • COVID Safety Lawsuits Against Amazon
  • ADT Spam Texts Lawsuit

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
(Add your review)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post
  • Laws

Starbucks Class Action Lawsuit Dismissed

Gavin January 13, 2022

A recent class-action lawsuit against Starbucks was dismissed because the coffee company is allegedly not filling drinks as advertised. This is a common practice at many coffee shops and the plaintiffs say the company intentionally underfills latte drinks to save money. The lawsuit seeks nominal compensation for class members and a big attorney fee. If […]

Law

Related Post

  • Laws

Rudy Indiana Otis Law – How to Find Legal Services

Gavin June 9, 2021December 7, 2021

The Rudy Indiana Otis Law has some interesting things to say about our current day civil code. It is important to understand these things if one is ever put in a situation where they may be required to testify under oath. As the Rudy Indiana Law states: “A person who has a justifiable reason for […]

  • Laws

Which Bankruptcy Lawyer in Queens is Right For You?

Gavin June 13, 2022June 10, 2022

If you are facing financial hardship, you may be wondering which bankruptcy lawyer in Queens is right for you. If so, you can consult one of the following attorneys for assistance: Charles Juntikka, Antoinette Osbourne, James J. DeCristofaro, Usar Law Group P.C., and Michael A. Silver. Each of these lawyers has decades of experience and […]

  • Laws

Chase Adjustable Rate Mortgage Lawsuit

Gavin December 25, 2022July 16, 2022

The plaintiffs in a Chase Adjustable Rate Mortgage Lawsuit claim that the company induces borrowers to maintain their modified payments by making them appear too good to be true. This is largely accomplished by repeatedly requesting documentation to determine homeowner eligibility. The documentation is then systematically mishandled and destroyed, and fees accrue on the mortgagor’s […]

Breaking News

Nerve Injury, Burns, and Amputations Occurring After IV Infiltration Are All Possible

Adjustable Rate Mortgage Interest Rates Lawsuits

Additional Companies For Forced Placed Flood Insurance

Chase Adjustable Rate Mortgage Lawsuit

How to File an ADT Security Lawsuit

Allura Fiber Cement Decking Lawsuits

Allura Siding Lawsuit Settlement

Copyright © 2023 Law Cost. All rights reserved. | Theme: Blook By Themeinwp. | Powered by WordPress